The Compliance Clock Is Ticking: Turning Emerging Regulations into Defensible Action
Using Minnesota PFAS reporting as a practical example of how compliance teams can assess exposure, close data gaps, and prepare for the next regulatory requirement.
Tuesday, September 15, 2026 – 12:00pm ET
Regulatory requirements are changing rapidly, and Minnesota’s approaching PFAS reporting deadline illustrates the growing pressure on manufacturers to understand what those changes mean for their products, suppliers, and reporting obligations.
Preparing the final report is only one part of the challenge. Compliance teams must first determine which requirements apply, identify exposure across components and BOMs, close gaps in supplier and material data, and document conclusions that can withstand regulatory, customer, and audit scrutiny.
In this webinar, SiliconExpert experts Khaled Mahmoud, El Deeb, and Dwight will use Minnesota PFAS reporting as a practical example of how organizations can move from regulatory confusion to clear, defensible action. The discussion will cover the evolving compliance landscape, product-level rollup reporting, hidden risk within supplier records and documentation, and the role of trusted AI in accelerating research and analysis.
Attendees will also learn how SiliconExpert’s Analyzer and Workflows capabilities can help teams assess product-level exposure, prioritize unresolved issues, organize investigations, and create more consistent processes for compliance review and reporting.
Whether your organization is preparing for Minnesota PFAS reporting, upcoming rollup requirements, or the next emerging regulation, this session will provide practical guidance for finding answers faster, improving visibility, and addressing compliance risk before it becomes a costly business disruption.
What You’ll Learn
- The Evolving Regulatory Landscape: How to keep pace as new chemical, product, and reporting requirements continue to emerge.
- From Regulation to Product-Level Risk: How to determine which requirements apply and identify exposure across components, suppliers, and BOMs.
- Building Defensible Compliance Decisions: How to close data gaps, document conclusions, and create reporting processes that can withstand customer, regulatory, and audit scrutiny.
- Minnesota PFAS as a Practical Example: How teams can use trusted data, AI, Analyzer, and Workflows to move from a new regulatory requirement to clear, actionable compliance decisions.
